In Fabric 2019 完整版本 電影
In Fabric-2019 小鴨 在线-英文-momovod-中国上映-google drive-線上看 小鴨-线上.jpg
In Fabric 2019 完整版本 電影
In Fabric (电影 2019) | |
持续 | 172 微细的 |
排放 | 2019-06-28 |
性质 | SDDS 1080 WEBrip |
题材 | Horror, Fantasy, Comedy |
(运用语言的)方式和风格 | English, Français |
抛 | Meriam K. Paisley, Petitot D. Finnlay, Lyons T. Dayne |
全体船员 - In Fabric 2019 完整版本 電影
A haunting ghost story set against the backdrop of a busy winter sales period in a department store, following the life of a cursed dress as it passes from person to person, with devastating consequences.
I’m going to give this film half a star because I hated it that much, but here’s the thing: isn’t such a reaction worth five stars? To simply dislike a film, move on and never give it a second thought is more of an insult than a half star rating. My full-bodied hatred of ‘In Fabric’ means that a gamut of emotions was run throughout the course of viewing, and that’s all a filmmaker is really trying to do, right? Invocation, no matter the result? And for that, ‘In Fabric’ is a raging success. Five stars!
- Jess Fenton
Read Jess' full article...
https://www.maketheswitch.com.au/article/review-in-fabric-the-best-worst-film-ever
Head to https://www.maketheswitch.com.au/sff for more Sydney Film Festival reviews.
**_Very strange, very stylish, very funny, but not for everyone_**
> _Modern man is drinking and drugging himself out of awareness, or he spends his time shopping, which is the same thing._
- Ernest Becker; _The Denial of Death_ (1973)
> _In those days a decree went out from Emperor Augustus that all the world should enjoy unprecedented savings on all their favourite brands. This was the first Black Friday and took place while Quirinius was governor of Syria. All went to their own towns to find their discounts. Joseph also went from the town of Nazareth in Galilee to Judea, to the cit__y of David called Bethlehem, because he had his eye on a new laptop. He went to be registered at Target with Mary, to whom he was engaged and who was expecting a child. While they were there, the time came for her to deliver her child. And she gave birth to her firstborn son and wrapped him in the latest styles from Old Navy, and laid him in a shopping cart, because they were waiting in line to get into Walmart._
- Adam Kotsko; "The story of the first Black Friday" (2014)
One of the most visually and aurally accomplished filmmakers currently working, writer/director Peter Strickland has thus far enjoyed considerable critical acclaim and some limited arthouse and festival success, but has been unable to make much of a mainstream impact. Not that he seems remotely bothered by this, as his latest, _In Fabric_, is easily the most impenetrable and singular work in his increasingly impressive _oeuvre_. On paper, it's all very straightforward – an unsuspecting customer buys a dress that seems to be haunted (or may actually be inherently evil), and it unleashes chaos in her life. But as anyone who has seen any of Strickland's previous films knows, bare plot outlines do little to convey the riches therein – sure, _Katalin Varga_ (2009) is a rape/revenge thriller, _Berberian Sound Studio_ (2012) is a giallo love-letter, and _The Duke of Burgundy_ (2014) is an S&M-themed lesbian romance, but each one goes to some truly unexpected places not in any way suggested by their ostensible subject matter. With _In Fabric_, although it definitely flirts with embracing the transformative power of fine clothing and the positive psychological effects one can experience by wearing something one believes to look fantastic, Strickland is far more interested in roundly mocking some of the more crass elements of consumerism, particularly the pernicious and seemingly irresistible lure of "the bargain", and the herd mentality manufactured, maintained, and exploited by retail corporations during Black Friday (an event that if witnessed by aliens would surely lead to them judging us too intellectually rudimentary to bother conquering). _In Fabric_'s biggest single problem is that it's actually made up of two loosely-connected storylines, but because the first one is so much more interesting, it leads to some narrative slackness in the second half, and all in all, it's not a patch on his best work to date, _The Duke of Burgundy_. Nevertheless, it's brilliantly acted, looks (and sounds) amazing, has an unparalleled commitment to the more tactile elements of the medium, is exceptionally funny, and will never allow you look at a washing machine (or a washing machine repairman) in quite the same way again.
Set in a London suburb at an unspecified point in time (although obviously meant to be during the 1980s), the film tells the story of bank teller Sheila Woolchapel (Marianne Jean-Baptiste, playing the role as if she's in a piece of 1960s social realist cinema). A recently-divorced mother to a teenage son, Vince (Jaygann Ayeh), whose older girlfriend Gwen (an unrecognisable Gwendoline Christie having an absolute blast) seems to have moved in without asking, Sheila's life is in a rut (the most excitement she has is watching Vince and Gwen having sex through a keyhole...don't ask). Having recently placed a lonely-hearts ad in the paper, she has an upcoming date, and is determined to make a good first impression, and so visits a Dentley & Soper department store looking to buy something nice in the January sales. Apparently run by a coven of witches who don't even bother trying to conceal their true identities, Sheila is all but accosted by Eastern European sales assistant Miss Luckmoore (Strickland regular Fatma Mohamed, who gleefully plays the role like she's in a Halloween special of _The Simpsons_, and who describes the store as "_a panoply of temptation_"). Talked into buying a beautiful "_artery red_" dress, it doesn't take long for Sheila to realise that something is not entirely kosher about the garment - from prompting dog attacks to trashing her washing machine to floating above her bed to having strange phrases sown into the lining ("_you who wear me will know me_") to featuring prominently in particularly nasty dreams, clearly the dress is as nefarious as a Dublin-made shell suit (although it looks slightly less ridiculous), and has nothing but bad intentions for poor Sheila. And to make matters worse, the date is a bust. Meanwhile, the wedding of washing machine repairman Reg (Leo Bill) and his fiancée Babs (Hayley Squires) is fast approaching; Sheila's micromanaging bosses, Stash and Clive (a hilarious Julian Barratt and Steve Oram, respectively), have some concerns over her method of shaking hands; Luckmoore and her boss, Lundy (Richard Bremmer), spend their free time doing something questionable to a mannequin; and a game of Ludo between Sheila, Vince, and Gwen redefines the term passive-aggressive.
Apparently inspired by Strickland's childhood memories of being taken to the January sales by his mother, he claims that they made such an indelible impression on his psyche that to this day, he experiences autonomous sensory meridian response whenever he encounters anything related to sales. Irrespective of this, _In Fabric_ is undeniably a consumerist satire, not entirely divorced from something like George A. Romero's _Dawn of the Dead_ (1978). The malignant control that capitalism exerts on the masses, the commodification of desire, the exploitation and manipulation of notions of self-worth, the vulgarity of a materialism serving as its own end - all are interwoven into the film's style, sensuality, and texture, much as the themes of his first three films are indistinguishable from their aesthetic design. Just look at how Strickland uses TV commercials advertising the sales; in a film partly about the impulses that drive us to purchase, these clips are the first (and certainly not the last) indication that consumerism is effectively a form of mass hypnosis. Strickland has a real talent for making theme elevate style into something more meaningful, and _In Fabric_ provides more evidence of that, with the highly-stylised aesthetic commenting on the ultimate emptiness of retail therapy, even as it seems to offer short-term happiness. Leaning into the artificiality of the film's _milieu_, Strickland makes no attempt to construct a believable, lived-in world, asking not only how do the customers of Dentley & Soper not realise something is wrong, but so too querying whether our own real-world behaviour is any different, when we see that item we've been craving turn up in a sale.
With that in mind, although this is not an especially realistic film, it is an absolutely gorgeous film, one that gleefully embraces gaudy 70s kitsch from literally its opening frames (a perfectly manicured hand violently opening a box, followed by the most 70s title sequence you'll see all year). Reproducing the hyper-stylised look of classic giallos, the most obvious touchstone is Dario Argento's _Suspiria_ (1977), with Strickland and his young Australian director of photography Ari Wegner (_The Kettering Incident_; _Lady Macbeth_; _Stray_) bathing the film in a lurid colour palette of over-the-top reds, purples, and greens. The other-worldly vibe is helped immensely by Cavern of Anti-Matter's synth score full of harsh electronic screams and repetitive droning, and the queasy, disorientating sound design by Martin Pavey, executive producer Ben Wheatley's regular sound designer. Filling the soundtrack with non-diegetic whispering and incantations, the aural design keeps the viewer constantly on edge, as if the evil in the dress has somehow infected the magnetic track. Indeed, the sound design is just as important here as it was in _Berberian Sound Studio_, a film which was literally about sound design - just listen to the sounds of the bargain-hunting crowds in Dentley & Soper, with the incoherent mumbling of their stampede into the store turned into a chaotic, animal-like din.
One of the film's most successful elements, and one of the reasons it's so funny, is how ultra-seriously everyone takes the whole thing. Jean-Baptiste, Bill, and Squires (the three ostensible leads) all play their parts as if they're in a Ken Loach film (which all three have been in the past), whilst Strickland, for his part, approaches the whole endeavour with a similar reverence - there's no winking at the audience here, and it's the absence of such winking that makes it all so funny. From Stash and Clive explaining the correct etiquette when meeting the mistress of one's boss to the sexual power that Reg has over women once he starts explaining the inner workings of a washing machine, the film's humour is rooted firmly in the fact that no one involved acts like they're in a comedy, and it's this self-seriousness which is so disarmingly and consistently funny (just look at the Ludo game from hell or the scene where Stash and Clive discuss the difference between "_looking for staff_" and "_trying to find staff_"). The scenes of the dress crawling around Sheila's house are especially funny partly because they look so ridiculous (you can all but see the wires leading off-camera), but mainly because Strickland treats them with complete sincerity, as if he's not actually in on the joke (which he most certainly is). A film about an evil dress shouldn't work on any level except parody, yet it's precisely because the film doesn't seem parodic that it works so well, and that's a testament to his immense control of tone. This is particularly true of the batshit insane proclamations uttered by Luckmoore ("_the hesitation in your voice soon to be an echo in the recesses of the spheres of retail_"; "_our perspectives on the specters of mortality must not be confused by an askew index of commerce_"; "_dimensions and proportions transcend the prisms of our measurements_"; "_did the transaction validate your paradigm of consumerism?_"). This is pure verbal diarrhoea, and can only be in any way effective if it's roundly mocked. And yet, it's the utter dearth of mockery that renders each statement so hilarious.
In terms of problems, by the very nature of what he's trying to accomplish, Strickland is somewhat guilty of allowing the film's sensual elements to overwhelm the characters. Certainly, the film burrows under your skin and lodges there, and Strickland has absolute mastery of the difficult-to-control tactile components of the medium, but aside from Luckmoore, none of the characters really linger in the mind, despite the superb cast. None are especially interesting as people, and when the film focuses on them rather than the inherent strangeness at its core, it slackens quite a bit. From an emotional point of view, there isn't a huge amount of empathy or pathos, and had Strickland focused on just the one storyline, the whole might have worked slightly better. Or perhaps he should have gone in the other direction entirely, making it a kind of ensemble piece, with five or six different storylines, watching the dress affect different people in different ways. Also in relation to this, because the Sheila plot is so much more interesting that the Reg plot, the film seems front-loaded, which is never good. And although it didn't bother me, some people will really dislike the amount of loose ends, unexplained background elements, and narrative dead ends, especially in the bonkers last act.
Nevertheless, I really enjoyed _In Fabric_. Yet more evidence that Strickland is a master stylist (in the best sense of the term), the craft behind the film is simply beyond reproach. Feeling for all the world like a rediscovered giallo, lost for the last four decades and restored to its original glory (complete with _very_ questionable dubbing), it's cryptic and impenetrable, but so too is it hilarious and a feast for the senses. No one makes films quite like Strickland, where the existential and esoteric rub shoulders with the tactile and the sensual, where the textures of the _milieu_ leap off the screen right alongside the themes. Hypnotic, seductive, immensely enjoyable, _In Fabric_ is quite unlike anything you'll see all year.
剧组人员
協調美術系 : Abram Helmond
特技協調員 : Clayton Lakota
Skript Aufteilung :Sharice Arlowe
附圖片 : Greer Pelin
Co-Produzent : Shalane Darvin
執行製片人 : Thiery Khadeem
監督藝術總監 : Romar Ciwan
產生 : Bret Emmett
Hersteller : Filicia Manette
表演者 : Tyrese Dorotha
Film kurz
花費 : $734,649,666
收入 : $567,691,456
分類 : 爭議 - 流產, 旅行 - 囚犯戲劇, 恐怖 - 愚蠢自由
生產國 : 毛里塔尼亞
生產 : Spümcø
In Fabric 2019 完整版本 電影
《2019電影》In Fabric 完整電影在線免費, In Fabric[2019,HD]線上看, In Fabric20190p完整的電影在線, In Fabric∼【2019.HD.BD】. In Fabric2019-HD完整版本, In Fabric('2019)完整版在線
In Fabric 埃斯特（數學）卡通-機會 |電影院|長片由 Comedy Unit 和 T3V Productions Elissa Kezzia aus dem Jahre 2002 mit Rejan Yashita und Abir Fodé in den major role, der in Maple Pictures Group und im Impossible Television 意 世界。 電影史是從 Seydina Kühner 製造並在 Not Finished 大會哈薩克斯坦 在 7 。 三月 四月 2001 在 21。 八月1980.
FileCaterpillar of Pachliopta aristolochiae Fabricius ~ English This photo was taken in the project Wiki Loves Butterfly Prakiti Tirtha Eco Park Butterfly Garden KolkataWest Bengal Caterpillar of Pachliopta aristolochiae Common Rose feeding the leaf of Aristolochia sp
嫘縈 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 嫘縈（léi yíngㄌㄟˊ ㄧㄥˊ），英文 Rayon 或 Viscose ，又譯人造絲，中文譯名是發想自中國傳說中發明養蠶的嫘祖而來。 嫘縈是一種人工製造的纖維。 由天然的植物 棉加工製造而成，所以屬於再生纖維。 吸水性佳，易染色，洗滌，耐酸鹼，不易起毛球，質地輕柔，特性較棉好穿價格與棉相仿。
聚四氟乙烯 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 聚四氟乙烯廣泛應用於各種需要抗酸鹼和有機溶劑的場合，並被用來製作不沾鍋以及乾式變壓器。 聚四氟乙烯質地柔軟，因此經常用於塗層 。 它剛被研究出來時的主要使用領域是高溫的發射火箭的內壁塗層。
File1543 Andreas Vesalius Fabrica Base Of The Brain ~ 你必須增加美國公有領域標籤顯示為何這個作品是適用於美國公有領域。 請注意少數國家的版權保護期為75年以上，墨西哥為100年，牙買加為95年 哥倫比亞為80年，瓜地馬拉與薩摩亞為75年。
不織布 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 本頁面最後修訂於2020年2月13日 星期四 0731。 本站的全部文字在創用CC 姓名標示相同方式分享 30協議 之條款下提供，附加條款亦可能應用。 （請參閱使用條款） Wikipedia®和維基百科標誌是維基媒體基金會的註冊商標；維基™是維基媒體基金會的商標。 維基媒體基金會是按美國國內稅收法501c3
聚酯 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 本頁面最後修訂於2019年12月8日 星期日 0719。 本站的全部文字在創用CC 姓名標示相同方式分享 30協議 之條款下提供，附加條款亦可能應用。 （請參閱使用條款） Wikipedia®和維基百科標誌是維基媒體基金會的註冊商標；維基™是維基媒體基金會的商標。 維基媒體基金會是按美國國內稅收法501c3
克維拉 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 克維拉（英語： Kevlar ，或譯凱芙拉、凱夫勒、凱庫勒、功夫龍等），是美國 杜邦公司於1965年推出的一種芳香聚醯胺類合成纖維，發明者為波蘭裔美國化學家史蒂芬妮·克沃勒克。 克維拉極佳的抗拉性能，其強度為同等質量鋼鐵的五倍，而密度僅為鋼鐵約五分之一（克維拉密度為每立方厘米144克
微服務 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 微服務 Microservices 是一種軟體架構風格，它是以專注於單一責任與功能的小型功能區塊 Small Building Blocks 為基礎，利用模組化的方式組合出複雜的大型應用程式，各功能區塊使用與語言無關 LanguageIndependentLanguage agnostic 的 API 集相互通訊。 微服務的起源是由 Peter Rodgers 博士於 2005 年度雲端運算
蘇爾壽公司 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 本頁面最後修訂於2019年11月11日 星期一 1616。 本站的全部文字在創用CC 姓名標示相同方式分享 30協議 之條款下提供，附加條款亦可能應用。 （請參閱使用條款） Wikipedia®和維基百科標誌是維基媒體基金會的註冊商標；維基™是維基媒體基金會的商標。 維基媒體基金會是按美國國內稅收法501c3
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar